Epstein Secrets

o Plaintiffs discovery requests. United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). The Fifth Amendment

th is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protect

he claimant must [also] be 'confronted by substantial and 'real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). Accordingly, responses to the requests propounded upon Epstein would provide information which is protected by the privi

1973) (the person complying with the subpoena "implicitly testifies that the evidence he brings forth is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protected from producing his documents in response to a Subpoena duces tecum, for his production of them i

nary, hazards of incrimination." United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). Accordingly, response

th is in fact the evidence demanded"); People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 27 (1926) ("A defendant is 'protect