Epstein Secrets

under seal in the court file on August 25, 2008. 1. The above referenced documents were Ordered Sealed at a hearing held before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008. 2. A Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records was filed by Non-Party EW on or about May 15, 2009. 3. A

ce the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its discretion to determine whether to permit intervention. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle 593 So.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1992). "In deciding this question the court should consider a number of factors, including the

2006CF009454AXX DIVISON: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. NCI R &ea ORDERSEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE THIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case no ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

ce the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its discretion to determine whether to permit intervention. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1992). "In deciding this question the court should consider a number of factors, including the

134AXX DIVISON: - W" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 1 ro AG R Fn ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE THIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nu ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

ce the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its discretion to determine whether to permit intervention. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v, Carlisle, 593 M.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1992). "In deciding this question the court should consider a number of factors, including the

09454AXX DIVISON: "W" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PNC, R EFVN ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE •FHIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nu ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

ce the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its discretion to determine whether to permit intervention. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1992). "In deciding this question the court should consider a number of factors, including the