Epstein Secrets

th a motion to seal. 09/12/2019 Age 3219 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331618 EFTA 00204344 EFTA02729330 8). Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo, sitting for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, accepted the plea (A-7). During the plea conference, Judge Pucillo asked Mr. Epstein whether a

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. Sce Perez v. Perez, 769 So. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Ha. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A- 17:16), denied a 09/1212019 g

2006CF009454AXX DIVISON: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. NCI R &ea ORDERSEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE THIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case no ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

lude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See Stale tuc rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband

orida criminal action (A-7; A- 2 The non-prosecution agreement and addendum are separately filed with a motion to seal. 2 EFTA00180640 8). Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo, sitting for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, accepted the plea (A-7). During the plea conference, Judge Pucillo asked Mr. Epstein whether a

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 So. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA0018064

orida criminal action (A-7; A- 2 The non-prosecution agreement and addendum are separately filed with a motion to seal. 2 EFTA00231134 8). Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo, sitting for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, accepted the plea (A-7). During the plea conference, Judge Pucillo asked Mr. Epstein whether a

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 M. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 E. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA00231139

134AXX DIVISON: - W" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 1 ro AG R Fn ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE THIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nu ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 1.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband p

orida criminal action (A-7; A- 2 The non-prosecution agreement and addendum are separately filed with a motion to seal. 2 EFTA00232254 8). Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo, sitting for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, accepted the plea (A-7). During the plea conference, Judge Pucillo asked Mr. Epstein whether a

granted, and the remedial quality of any such harm. See Perez v. Perez, 769 So. 2d 389, 391 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So. 2d 1037, 1038 n.3 (Fla. 1980). The trial court agreed that Mr. Epstein had established irreparable harm (A-17:16), denied a 7 EFTA0023225

09454AXX DIVISON: "W" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PNC, R EFVN ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT IN COURT FILE •FHIS MATTER came before the Honorable Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo on June 30, 2008 during a plea conference in the above-referenced case nu ber. The Court being fully apprised in the circumstances, it is h

clude the moving party's likelihood of success on the merits, and the likelihood of harm should a stay not be granted. See State ex rel. Price v. McCord, 380 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1980). During the course of the trial court pro- ceedings, the children had been spending the summer with the Former Husband