Epstein Secrets

ved this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 7th day of January, 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 L m k Worth FL 33461 imo s Fax: C unse or ainti Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. H

by Judge William J. Zloch on 8/6/2008. (bc) (Entered: 08/06/2008) 08/07/2008 12 I 173 KB MOTION to Reassign Case TO JUDGE KENNETH MARRA by . (Willits, Richard) (Entered: 08/07/2008) 08/07/2008 B r 34.1 KB MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 6 Sealed Document, 7 Sealed Document TO MOTION TO STAY file

ailed to state a cause of action under either common or statutory law, and thus, Count I against EPSTEIN is required to be dismissed. Rule 12(b)(6), Fla.R.Civ.P. Count I alleges in part that while Plaintiff was a minor, beginning when she was 14 — 6. On numerous occasions ..., JEFFREY EPSTEIN intentionall

305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 Counsel for Plaints,* In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10a Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Re

n of litigation or for trial. ace Alachua General Hospital. Inc. v. Zimmer USA. Inc., 403 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Fed.R. Civ.Pro. 26(bX3XB); Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1.280; In re Faro Technologies Securities Litigation, 2008 WL 205318 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Lake Shore Radiator. Inc. v. Radiator Express Warehouse

served this day on all counsel of recd A identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of March , 2009: Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H Willits P A tom* Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss P.A.

ied in 18 U.S.C. §2255 in order to state a cause of action. Thus, Counts I through XXX against EPSTEIN are required to be dismissed. Rule 12(b)(6), Fla.R.Civ.P. (2) Count XXXI — Sexual Battery is also required to be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action as Plaintiff has failed to allege the re