Epstein Secrets

RCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLITS: Good morning, Your Honor. Richard 14 Willits, here on behalf of the plaintiff C.M.A.. 15 THE COURT: Good morning. 16 MS. EZELL: Good morning, Your Honor. I'm Katherine 17 Ezell from Podhurs

not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respondent points out, the Agreement was not filed in this 10 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue in addition to the arguments it sets forth herein. " The Post notes that A-3 through A-5 were not part of th

at the reply is due 10 days from service of the last-filed response. Opposing counsel has contacted counsel for respondents (William J. Berger for E.W.; Diana L. Martin for B.B.; and Deanna K. Shullman for the Post), who have all advised they have no objection to this motion. 2 EFTA00233660 -Q-~

served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 8day of May , 2009 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Plainti Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scar

, Vegas Cabaret, Spearmint Rhino, T's Lounge, Pure Platinum, Solid Gold, and The Body Shop. Substantial discovery will take place in that matter of E.W.'s co-workers, supervisors and others that may have Information regarding the claims she asserted against Epstein. Epstein should be afforded that sa

[email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 0840119, 08- 80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08- 80994 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, PA 229010°i Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Rela

s: 1. EW is filed a motion to vacate the agreed order sealing records and to unseal the nonprosecutuion agreement and addendum in this file. Also, E.W. opposed defendant's motion to unseal said records. E.W.'s motion was granted and defendant's was denied at hearing on June 26, 2009. 2. E.W. is en

44:2 we've 15:4 35:23 363 43:12 whatsoever 27:7 while 32:7 34:16 35:14 whole 20:12 38:11 wide 26:24 43:19 willful 8:23 12:7 willfully 9:19 Willits 1:23 3:13,14 26:10,10,14,15 27:12,19 win 29:5 withdraw 28:8,11 wonderful 28:23,24 word 24:21 worried 39:22 worry 41:1 I Worth 1:24 writing

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no