Epstein Secrets

hildren who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. *390 Marsha B. Elsa. Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Bef

to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. 1.4, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

ildren who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. *390 Marsha B. Elser, Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Pcrwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Bef

to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. 14„, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic

ildren who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. •390 Marsha B. Elser. Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & BoIdt, and Kimberly L. Bolds, Miami, for appellee. Bef

d to produce the documents under seal and the trial court denied the motion for stay and imposed daily fines until the documents were produced. Id, The First District Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's order and noted Mariner has failed to explain how the production of the reports under seal would result in any prejudic