Epstein Secrets

ey would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." I° Due to the subsequent objections raised by Epstein's counsel, Mr. Josefsberg was never given the opportunity to become the attorney representative. Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product -7- EFTA00224642 Mr.

ard B. should be that independent third-pasty/special master. Ultimately, Judge selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, et a1.10 During this same time frame, Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz sought to delay the entry of his guilty plea and sentence. After the SDFL accomm

ently agreed that retired Federal District Court Jude Edward B. should be that independent third-pasty/special master. Ultimately, Judge selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, et a1.10 During this same time frame, Epstein lawyer Jay Lefkowitz sought to delay the entry of his

On or about July 15, 2004, DefendantIMEMS placed one or niorii telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. (67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendan caused Jane Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. (68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant telephone c

ildren who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. *390 Marsha B. Elser, Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Pcrwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Bef

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely m mad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosu

ildren who are also not parties in appellate proceedings. •390 Marsha B. Elser. Miami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & BoIdt, and Kimberly L. Bolds, Miami, for appellee. Bef

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely ad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosure