Epstein Secrets

costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstan

B-Mail: RBlack@Royalackcom Thank you for your letter of February 11, 2010. We write to update you about ongoing efforts to reach an agreement with Robert Josefsberg regarding the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil

vised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review Mr. Josefsberg's outstanding bills on a line-by-line basis and attempt to reach a non- adversarial resolution of all outstanding fee issues. Mr. Critton also transm

er to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe I pstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

nd call them at trial. Nothing shall prohibit Second Parties from conducting his defense, investigation and trial as his lawyers deems appropriate. Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell are hereby deemed to have full authority to accept a subpoena on First Parties behalf, so as EFTA00609405 not to violate the

l Release ("Settlement Agreement") in order to resolve the pending litigation (the "Litigation") between them as follows: 1. Case No. 09-CV-80591—Marra/Johnson. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80591 — Marra/J

ial. Nothing shall prohibit Second Parties from conducting his defense, investigation and trial as his lawyers deems 3 EFTA00609440 appropriate. Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell are hereby deemed to have full authority to accept a subpoena on First Parties behalf, so as not to violate the No Contact orde

Release ("Settlement Agreement") in order to resolve the pending litigation (the "Litigation") between them as follows: 1. Case No. 09-CV-80656— Marra/Johnson. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-CV-80656 — Marra/J