Epstein Secrets

lowed for Epstein to commit suicide in federal custody. "Heads must roll," Sasse wrote. "Every single person in the Justice Department — from your Main Justice headquarters staff all the way to the night-shift jailer — knew that this man was a suicide risk, and that his dark secrets couldn't be allowed to d

. In reviewing the history of the CVRA in its 2016 decision in Federal Insurance Company v. United States of America, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit noted that because the act began as a proposed constitutional amendment, the law is "relatively sparse [in] technical detail." That lack of detail h

be happy to know that at least there was consideration given at the top of the U.S. Attorney's Office whether to raise this more centrally within Main Justice. There may or may not be an interest in taking a fresh look — I don't know, and I don't presume to know the politics at all — but mindful that ther

mes when even though what I just said about the Supreme Court's view of gag orders and prior restraints and so forth, that in the Don King case, in the Second Circuit, the circuit upheld restrictions there on who could speak, the trial participants. And, again, I would say it's not so much a categorical either/o

be happy to know that at least there was consideration given at the top of the U.S. Attorney's Office whether to raise this more centrally within Main Justice. There may or may not be an interest in taking a fresh look — I don't know, and I don't presume to know the politics at all — but mindful that ther

mes when even though what I just said about the Supreme Court's view of gag orders and prior restraints and so forth, that in the Don King case, in the Second Circuit, the circuit upheld restrictions there on who could speak, the trial participants. And, again, I would say it's not so much a categorical either/o

the supervision of R. Alexander Acosta, then United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("SDFL"), and approved by senior levels of Main Justice, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. In that NPA, the government agreed that any federal prosecution of Epstein in the SDFL would

t in this District as barred by what they claimed was an earlier "plea agreement" in the Eastern District, and the court denied the motion. Id. The Second Circuit, in affirming the denial, stated simply that "[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the p

lowed for Epstein to commit suicide in federal custody. "Heads must roll," Sasse wrote. "Every single person in the Justice Department — from your Main Justice headquarters staff all the way to the night-shift jailer — knew that this man was a suicide risk, and that his dark secrets couldn't be allowed to d

. In reviewing the history of the CVRA in its 2016 decision in Federal Insurance Company v. United States of America, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit noted that because the act began as a proposed constitutional amendment, the law is "relatively sparse [in] technical detail." That lack of detail h

lowed for Epstein to commit suicide in federal custody. "Heads must roll," Sasse wrote. "Every single person in the Justice Department — from your Main Justice headquarters staff all the way to the night-shift jailer — knew that this man was a suicide risk, and that his dark secrets couldn't be allowed to d

. In reviewing the history of the CVRA in its 2016 decision in Federal Insurance Company v. United States of America, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit noted that because the act began as a proposed constitutional amendment, the law is "relatively sparse [in] technical detail." That lack of detail h

the supervision of R. Alexander Acosta, then United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida ("SDFL"), and approved by senior levels of Main Justice, including the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. In that NPA, the government agreed that any federal prosecution of Epstein in the SDFL would

t in this District as barred by what they claimed was an earlier "plea agreement" in the Eastern District, and the court denied the motion. Id. The Second Circuit, in affirming the denial, stated simply that "[I] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the p