Epstein Secrets

ICES OF GERALD B. LEFammer, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 148 EAST 78Th NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT [email protected] SHERYL E. REICH NIcletcourtlawoom RENATO C. STABILE slabIle&elcourIlawcorn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN [email protected] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

GERALD B. LEpcouErr, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 148 EAST 78" STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT lefccitul@letcourtlaw corn SHERYL E. REICH NideilkOuNsw.com RENATO C. STABILE stablefcaurlaw.com FAITH A. FRIEDMAN flriolmsnalccostlawcom BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman

knowingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice minors. United States' Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 F.3d 1° indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls Haley Robson may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epste

LAw 0.74=1 or GERALD B. Lnrcounr, P.C. A PROFeSSIONAL CORPORATION 1493 CAST TB" STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH riBlialloROWEWN:orn RENATO C. STABILE altRINBIeBoustar tom rainy BY HAND Chief of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office S

d at meeting place. Court vacated & remanded because downward departure not warranted.. 2422(6) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting to U.S. v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 1299 (11'h Cir. 2003) Interne( Internet chat room communications with "13 yr-old"; sexually explicit; told her he would give her powe

S Of GERALD B. LuttatiRT, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 148 EAST 70'" STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LERCOURT Www1Glefeowfiew.com SHERYL E. REICH tolthalertauellaw.com RENATO C. STABILE slebReelorcourUaW.00m FAITH A. FRIEDMAN Illedomaxvilaw.cam TELEPHONE (212) 737.0400 FACSIMILE (212)

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26'h meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

LAW orricr.s OF that.an B. LEFcarsirr, P.G. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH RENATO C. STABILE FAITH A. FRIEDMAN BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 First Assistant United States Attorney ., Chief, Criminal Division e United

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though