Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
r assessments of points on the RAI should render the Court's Level 3 determination invalid. B. The Court Improperly Allowed Personal Feelings and Matters Outside the Record to Influence Its SORA Determination. Next, the Court abused its discretion by allowing an apparent personal distaste for Appellant, the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
assessments of points on the R.Al should render the Court's Level 3 determination invalid. B. The Court Improperly Allowed Personal Feelings and Matters Outside the Record to Influence Its SORA Determination. Next, the Court abused its discretion by allowing an apparent personal distaste for Appellant, the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
r assessments of points on the RAI should render the Court's Level 3 determination invalid. B. The Court Improperly Allowed Personal Feelings and Matters Outside the Record to Influence Its SORA Determination. Next, the Court abused its discretion by allowing an apparent personal distaste for Appellant, the
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
r assessments of points on the RAI should render the Court's Level 3 determination invalid. B. The Court Improperly Allowed Personal Feelings and Matters Outside the Record to Influence Its SORA Determination. Next, the Court abused its discretion by allowing an apparent personal distaste for Appellant, the
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both the State of New York and Matters Outside
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON472 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
George W. Bush
PERSON104 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
New York
LOCATION93 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
New York City
LOCATION88 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION62 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
New York State
LOCATION51 w/ the·2 w/ Matters
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON44 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON41 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
Albany
LOCATION33 w/ the·2 w/ Matters
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON24 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
Stephen Hawking
PERSON24 w/ the·2 w/ Matters
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION22 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
V.I.C.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
ORGANIZATION9 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
LB
Lanna Belohlavek
PERSON10 w/ the·2 w/ Matters
Legislature
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Matters
WE
Weiss
PERSON9 w/ the·2 w/ Matters