Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
, 2010, was adjourned on consent of the parties until January 18, 2011 to provide the New York District Attorney ("the People"), which represented the State of New York at the SORA hearing, an opportunity to investigate Appellant's Florida convictions and assess the validity of the Board's recommendation. See A.81
EVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SUPPORTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SORA AND AS A MATTER OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 17 A. The People's Investigation Revealed That The Board's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both the State of New York and The People's Investigation
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON472 w/ the·4 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON104 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York
LOCATION93 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York City
LOCATION88 w/ the·4 w/ The
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION62 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York State
LOCATION51 w/ the·2 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON44 w/ the·4 w/ The
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON41 w/ the·4 w/ The
Albany
LOCATION33 w/ the·2 w/ The
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON24 w/ the·4 w/ The
Stephen Hawking
PERSON24 w/ the·2 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION22 w/ the·4 w/ The
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ The
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON17 w/ the·4 w/ The
V.I.C.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ the·4 w/ The
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services
ORGANIZATION9 w/ the·4 w/ The
LB
Lanna Belohlavek
PERSON10 w/ the·2 w/ The
Legislature
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·4 w/ The
WE
Weiss
PERSON9 w/ the·2 w/ The