Epstein Secrets

communications by you and Mr. Edwards, as attorneys, with the media are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6., entitled "Trial Publicity," states: (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial sta

ublicity in this matter concerning Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females, consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We trust that you will agree to a swift and amicable resolution of this issue. Otherwise, we will seek judicial intervention and ask Judge Crow to

munications between the media and lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supr

sexual abuse of or being with minor females; or, (2) is injurious to Mr. Bradley Edwards' reputation, consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We trust that you will agree to a swift and amicable resolution of this issue. Otherwise, we will seek judicial intervention and ask Judge Crow to

communications by you and Mr. Edwards, as attorneys, with the media are also limited by the requirements of Rule 4-3.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Rule 4-3.6., entitled "Trial Publicity," states: (a) Prejudicial Extrajudicial Statements Prohibited. A lawyer shall not make an extrajudicial sta

munications between the media and lawyers and/or litigants are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supr

fendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to the foregoing authorities and consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, to issue a Protective Order barring Mr. Jack Scarola, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, and their respective agents and employees

ol and prohibit such extra- judicial commentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Shepnard v. - 2 - EFTA00

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 74 of 100 nsor & Associates Reponing aid Tram ripurm, Inc 1 2 Page 48 Florida Bar? A. I did not select him. 3 Q. Who did? 4 A. My father. 5 Q. Did you ever meet Mr. Herman? 6 A. Once. 7 Q. Don't -- don't tell me wh

ce notice is not always required: Unlike the closure of court proceedings, which has been held to require notice and hearing prior to closure, see Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Lewis, 426.. 2d I (Fla. 1982), The closure of court records has not required prior notice. Requiring prior notice of closure of a court record