Epstein Secrets

ers 12 at ic. 12 perhaps at a different tine and even perhaps in a 13 MS. ROCKEHBACH: He was the ethics director 13 different forum. 14 for the Florida Bar for almost a decade, authoring 14 Really what has to be atterpted to be divined IS thousand➢ of opinions on legal ethics for lawyer➢ is today i

I agree that that wa➢ something 12 like Mr. Scarola -- 23 that the Court had a specific interest in and has 13 THE COURT: Excuse rm. Is Mr. Ackerman still 24 always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? 25 to be on the table in a timely fashion ➢o that, 25 NR

mulated 85:6 accurate 99:4,10 accurately 67:4 accusations 27:7 30:15 96:12,14 accusatory 30:16 accuse 91:6 accused 7:11,13 68:3,4 86:25 88:1 Ackerman 8:1 35:23 36:1,1,2 56:23 Ackerman's 48:25 acknowledged 5:11 86:1 87:12 Act 16:1 acted 27:10 action 23:20 50:2 83:24 84:2,3 85:13 86:14 89:1

ers 12 at ic. 12 perhaps at a different tine and even perhaps in a 13 MS. ROCKEHBACH: He was the ethics director 13 different forum. 14 for the Florida Bar for almost a decade, authoring 14 Really what has to be atterpted to be divined IS thousand➢ of opinions on legal ethics for lawyer➢ is today i

I agree that that wa➢ something 12 like Mr. Scarola -- 23 that the Court had a specific interest in and has 13 THE COURT: Excuse rm. Is Mr. Ackerman still 24 always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? 25 to be on the table in a timely fashion ➢o that, 25 NR

mulated 85:6 accurate 99:4,10 accurately 67:4 accusations 27:7 30:15 96:12,14 accusatory 30:16 accuse 91:6 accused 7:11,13 68:3,4 86:25 88:1 Ackerman 8:1 35:23 36:1,1,2 56:23 Ackerman's 48:25 acknowledged 5:11 86:1 87:12 Act 16:1 acted 27:10 action 23:20 50:2 83:24 84:2,3 85:13 86:14 89:1

all of ua at 32 the firm went through in terms of being interviewed 33 by law enforcement and that sort of thing, I was 34 also interviewed by the Florida Bar. And one of the 25 points they raised was the fact that I was being II 15 17 IS 19 Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00798

ll of when were involved at some point 21 In time in the representation of Jeffrey Epstein, 32 Correct? 33 A Yea. 24 Q I think I missed Mr. Ackerman on that list. 23 Mr. Ackerman as well. 136 I BY NE. SCAROLA: 2 Q Lot me restate the question. 3 what extent, if any, would it be necessary

9 accident 94:23 95:17 account 29:15 accountable 107:14 accounts 29:1,2,5 accurate 114:13 accused 46:23 151:9 accusing 50:11 achieved 122:3 Ackerman 90:18 134:24.25 135:1.2 acknowledge 56:24 acknowledged 135:6 acquainted 15:14 acquired 19:13 act 53:24 acted 136:5 acting 134:3 action 8:2

fendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests this Court, pursuant to the foregoing authorities and consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, to issue a Protective Order barring Mr. Jack Scarola, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Mr. Bradley J. Edwards, and their respective agents and employees

ldber er & Weiss P.A. - 5 - EFTA00616240 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. By: Jose hi. Ackerman, Esq. W:1807431MTNPRO29-:o preclode opposing counsel's exirajudicial staternenis.EEG docx - 6 - EFTA00616241 Convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstei

he Florida Bar against Edwards, raising allegations that Edwards and others were involved in Rothstein's wrongdoing. After investigating the claim, the Florida Bar dismissed the complaint. In July, Edwards received a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office -- the office responsible for prosecuting Rothstein --

," court papers say. "During all of these depositions, Epstein refused to answer any substantive questions about his sexual abuse of minor girls." Ackerman said the Rothstein lawsuit is a different situation than Epstein taking the Fifth in depositions regarding the victims, because the allegations aga