Epstein Secrets

subject case now under consideration by the SDFL. Recently, I learned that there is a reference to the law firm of "Herman Shaman& Mermelstein" on the Florida Bar website, under a section called "Find A Lawyer." This reference appears when Stuart Mermelstein's name and information is accessed. To reiterate, si

ip with that law firm, financial or otherwise, and no input or control over the firm's filings with the Florida Division of Corporations and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was pla

ve to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto as Tab E. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurs

that RBA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that at:7.gs to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and o

mitted, COFFEY BURLINGTON Counsel for Plaindffs 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse Miami, Florida 33133 (305) 858-2900 B OS I LLADNECIV FEIN Florida Bar . 259861 Annexed hereto as Exhibit A is an affidavit from Plaintiff Rosenfeldt attesting to the truthfulness of the allegations contained herein.

fraudulent court 10 EFTA00729449 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

e subject case now under consideration by the SOFL. Recently, I learned that there is a reference to the law firm of "Herman Annan& Mermelstein" on the Florida Bar website, under a section called "Find A Lawyer." This reference appears when Stuart Mermelstein's name and information is accessed. To reiterate, si

ip with that law firm, financial or otherwise, and no input or control over the firm's filings with the Florida Division of Corporations and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was pla

sentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto as Tab arties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge E B. should be that independent third-party/special master. Ultimately, Judge selecte o ert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Or

P-014952 EFTA00224739 consideration by the SDFL. Recently, I learned that there is a reference to the law firm of "Herman Slumart&Mermelstein" on the Florida Bar website, under a section called "Find A Lawyer." This reference appears when Stuart Mermelstein's name and information is accessed. To reiterate. si

presentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. Davis should be that independent third-party. Ultimately, Judge Davis selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Or

nder 11 EFTA00190448 consideration by the S0FL. Recently, I learned that there is a reference to the law firm of "Herman Sluman& Mermelstein" on the Florida Bar website, under a section called "Find A Lawyer." This reference appears when Stuart Mermelstein's name and information is accessed. To reiterate, si

presentative to an independent third-party. A copy of the October 29, 2007 Addendum is attached hereto. The parties subsequently agreed that retired Federal District Court Judge Edward B. should be that independent third-party. Ultimately, Judge selected Robert C. Josefsberg of the law firm of Podhurst, Orseck, Jose

that RRA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and ot

raudulent court 10 EFTA00596534 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

that RBA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and ot

ve the clients, defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators created a false and fraudulent court 10 EFTA00683134 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

THSTEIN investors that RRA's trust accounts in ned with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with d regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accoun I egedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co

lent court 10 EFTA00795633 ' • 4 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately S23 million. The fraudulent co

that RRA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and ot

raudulent court 10 EFTA00193860 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co

that RRA's trust accounts were maintained with a well established international banking institution, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Florida Bar, and that access to balances in the trust accounts was allegedly monitored by one of the two independent verifiers. 17. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and ot

raudulent court 10 EFTA00223313 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 11 of 36 order purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge which falsely alleged that the clients had prevailed in the lawsuit and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent co