Epstein Secrets

ey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, At the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the O Official Florida Bar website continued to identify Mr. Sloman as a named partner in Mr. I ferman's firm. See Tab 31, Florida Bar Website page. 39. Mr. Herman, who is t

y your Office: IT APPEARING, alter an inv.:30101km of the ulTenses and Upslein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the hallowing procedure . . . Epstein understands that the United States Attorney has no authority to require the State At

ter, I received a letter from Jeffrey Herman, one of the civil attorneys who represented a number of victims, notifying me that he had complained to the Florida Bar that the Victim Notification Letters violated the Florida Bar rules against solicitation. He had filed complaints against myself and against Robert

e was insufficient evidence to charge him with any offense; (b) there was no basis for federal prosecution and that federal prosecution violated the Petite policy; (c) I had engaged in prosecutorial misconduct during the investigation and resolution of the matter; (d) Jeff Sloman had engaged in prosecu

3 PAX 305 330 3140 JAY P. lancoVirra, Esq. Demand, 2007 ?AM/ 2 ore RXECUrINE MICR Q003 any past or fittare delay. Mr. Epstein currently has lbw Florida Bar members on his defense team, so attorney scheduling is not an adequate basis for delay. Three weeks ago talso asked you to provide our Office with

1) and 2; and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dist

(d) prohibits a lawyer from engaging in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. In Florida Bar v. Frederick, 756 So. 2d 79, 87 (Fla. 2000), the court noted that FRPC 4-8.4(d) is not limited to conduct that occurs in a judicial proceeding, but

ngle forum in which to proceed to satisfy the substantial federal and state interests involved.” If a substantial question arises as to whether the Petite policy applies to a particular prosecution, the prosecutor should submit the matter to the appropriate Assistant Attorney General for resolution.