Epstein Secrets

e the issuance of such broad pretrial subpoenas under Rule 17. See United States v. Cherry, 876 F. Supp. 547, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); United States v. Gross, 24 F.R.D. 138, 141 (S.D.N.Y. 1959) (Rule 17(c) cannot be used "to obtain leads as to the existence of additional documentary evidence or to seek i

ollowed the practice of permitting both the defense and the Government to submit ex parte applications for Rule 17(c) subpoenas."); United States v. Reyes, 162 F.R.D. 468, 470 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (permitting ex parte applications because a party must "detail its trial strategy or witness list in order to

e the issuance of such broad pretrial subpoenas under Rule 17. See United States v. Cherry, 876 F. Supp. 547, 552 (S.D.N.Y. 1995); United States v. Gross, 24 F.R.D. 138, 141 (S.D.N.Y. 1959) (Rule 17(c) cannot be used "to obtain leads as to the existence of additional documentary evidence or to seek i

ollowed the practice of permitting both the defense and the Government to submit ex parte applications for Rule 17(c) subpoenas."); United States v. Reyes, 162 F.R.D. 468, 470 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (permitting ex parte applications because a party must "detail its trial strategy or witness list in order to

rwards object.4 MIS Guidelines. p 18. 2 Rio Tinto Zne Corpn is Westinghouse Electric Corpn (1978) AC 547; Must v Park Lane Hotel(1942) 2 KB 253. 3 Reyes (1861)1 B & S 311 (witness pardoned for offence: possibility of impeachment too remote EO afford privilege): Rio Tinto Zine Carpi is Westinghouse Be

If a person not named on the warrant accompanies the constable in the execution of the warrant then the entry. search, and seizure will be unlawful: Gross aSouthwark Crown Coun (1999) QB 538 (presence of American investigator not named on the warrant unlawful). Therefore, if foreign investigators wish