Epstein Secrets

0119 Page No. 15 from any disclosures and are therefore different than a regulated/public record that can be accessed by the public. In Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), the court maintained that "[r]outine discovery of tax returns is not the rule but rather t

FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 rjosefsberg@J,podhurst.com kezell

t” standard for production than would otherwise apply to discovery. Epstein’s Appeal at 15. The authority for this claim is said to be Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), which reviews some decisions from within the Second Circuit and Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM D

Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits@aol

legal precedents for the inclusion of psychiatric testimony in matters concerning wrongful death of a parent and loss of parental services, in both New York State and California. He has testified in over 275 cases including over 100 trials. A Federal Rule 26 list is available on request and on www.expertchild

t, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg /s/ Adam D. Horowitz 15 EFTA00182866 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM