Epstein Secrets

ey E. Epstein, Plaintiffs, I CITIBANK, NA. and Citigroup, Inc. d/b/a "Citigroup," Defendants. No. CIV.2002-108. District Court, Virgin Islands, Appellate Division, D. St. Thomas and St. John. Dec. 30, 2004. Background: Borrowers brought action against bank, alleging that false state- ments or statements whe

lan... 5/14/2007 EFTA00187439 $DNY CM/ECF Version 3.0L - Docket Report Page 1 of 5 CLOSED U.S. District Court United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:02-cv-05332-SITS Citibank, N.A.I Epstein, et al Assigned to: Judge Sidney H. Stein Demand:

es Attorney , Acting First Assistant Executive Assistant Special Counsel Acting Chief, Criminal Division Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Chief, Appellate Division Chief, Asset Forfeiture Division Chief, Civil Division Acting Chief, PINS Chief, Narcotics Chief, Economic and Environmental Crimes Section Chi

Release SEBASTIAN WOMAN SENTENCED ON FRAUD CHARGES September 21, 2004 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jeffrey II. Sloman, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Guy P. Fallen, Special Agent in Charge, Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General, and Arnie R. Tanchak, Resident Spe

d States Attorney Vacant, First Assistant Executive Assistant , Special Counsel Chief, Criminal Division Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Chief, Appellate Division Chief, Asset Forfeiture Division Chief, Civil Division Chief, PINS , Chief, Narcotics Chief, Economic and Environmental Crimes Section Chief, M

N PREPARER PLEADS GUILTY TO TAX PREPARATION FRAUD SCHEME June 10, 7009 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and Daniel W. Auer, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division, announced that defendant Beaude

Assistant , Executive Assistant Special Counsel , Chief, Criminal Division Deputy Chief, Criminal Division , Managing AUSA for the North Chief, Appellate Division Chief, Asset Forfeiture Division , Chief, Civil Division Chief, PINS , Chief, Narcotics Chief, Economic and Environmental Crimes Section t , C

N August 8, 2010 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Miami-Dade and Sroward School Districts Agree to Participate Wifredo A. Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Honda, and members tne South Florida Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force (SFL-ICAC), today announce, a local initiative to conduct Inter

larly, a decision of the Honorable Justice Ruth Pickholz on our about January 18, 2011. I believe that decision was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read this morning a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before Judge Pickholz which I'm likely to place on the

at the nonpros agreement was circumvented by the prosecutors in Florida when they encouraged their witnesses and their witnesses' lawyers to go to the Southern District and catalyze and create a case. That's unique. These were not two silos, the Southern District of Florida and the Southern District of New York. I

larly, a decision of the Honorable Justice Ruth Pickholz on our about January 18, 2011. I believe that decision was appealed to the New York State Appellate Division and was unanimously upheld. I read this morning a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before Judge Pickholz which I'm likely to place on the

at the nonpros agreement was circumvented by the prosecutors in Florida when they encouraged their witnesses and their witnesses' lawyers to go to the Southern District and catalyze and create a case. That's unique. These were not two silos, the Southern District of Florida and the Southern District of New York. I

g a minor to perform a sex act on him during a “massage.” Although he was never indicted or convicted for hiring any other underage girls, the state Appellate Division found there was “clear and convincing evidence” he had indeed done so, making the Level 3 designation appropriate. a2 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011943 http:

ing, was Epstein’s relationship with Jean Luc Brunel, owner of the MC2 modeling agency. According to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an alleged victim said that Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, Rodriguez, and Marcinkova “deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that i

a minor to perform a sex act on him during a "massage." Although he was never indicted or convicted for hiring any other underage girls. the state Appellate Division found there was "clear and convincing evidence" he had indeed done so. making the Level 3 designation appropriate. 32 EFTA00599890 http://pagesi

g. was Epstein's relationship with Jean Luc Brunel, owner of the MC2 modeling agency. According to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an alleged victim said that Epstein • and girlfriend Ghislaine] Maxwell, Brunel. [house manager Alfredo] Rodriguez. and 'deliberately

stant Alicia O. Valle, Special Counsel Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Kenneth Noto, Deputy Chief, Criminal Division Anne Schultz, Chief, Appellate Division Gerardo Simms, Chief, Asset Forfeiture Division Wendy A. Jacobus, Chief, Civil Division David Weinstein, Chief, PINS Karen Gilbert, Chief, Narcot

D.C., for plaintiff-appellant. Leonard Alan Sands, Coconut Grove, Fla., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judg

absolute right to meet” with USAO officials because he believed that he was the victim of a federal crime. Acosta forwarded the message to the USAO Appellate Division Chief, who informed Acosta and Sloman that, according to the 2005 Guidelines, “our obligations under [the CVRA] are not triggered until charges are

ence, which requires judicial approval. Acosta rejected this idea, however, apparently because of a perception that the federal district courts in the Southern District of Florida did not view Rule 11(c) pleas favorably and might refuse to accept such a plea and thus limit the USAO’s options. Another alternative