Epstein Secrets

ument 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Flietit0A ()MO D.C. ELECT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON, and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 1

ous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the plaintiff has failed to

per acts by BoA. To the extent Mr. Steadman's claims are predicated on such acts, rather than on Green Tree's acts, they are not viable. 2 See also Johnson v. Fed Home Loan Mort. Corp.. No. C12-1712 TSZ. 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10485. 2013 WL 308957. at '4 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 25. 2013) ("IAN assignee is liab

the relevant law, and deeming oral argument unnecessary, the court grants in part and denies in part the motion. II. BACKGROUND In March 2003, Mr. Steadman obtained a loan for $190,000.00, which was secured by the property at 9015 171st Ave NE, Redmond, WA, 98052, and evidenced by a Note and Deed of Tr

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 FIP6040y1 0O1$00 D.C. ELECT tic UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE N1, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE

ous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the plaintiff has failed to

AM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 peangl (O1)60 D.C. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, aik/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. July 18, 2008 STEVEN N. LARUAORE CLERK O.S. MST. CT.

ous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the plaintiff has failed to

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. :me °D4° July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIM0111 CLERK U4.

ous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the plaintiff has failed to