Epstein Secrets

Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07 21 '2008 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. HERMAN REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND THIS COURT'S ORDE

cess server also mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008, via first class mail. (DE 4)." It is my understanding that the Affidavit of Service (DE 4) crosses out language regarding mail to the Defendant, and that the process server in this case did not mail a copy of the Summons and Compla

Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)29:2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.

nst Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a

Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06)11.2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT, O

lows: 1. This action was filed on February 6, 2008. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with the Summons and Complaint. A copy of the Affidavit of Service was filed with the Court. (D.E. 4). 2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1), Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was required to answer or otherwise serve a r

TATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, through co

N.Y.S.C., Appellate Division, June 26, 2008). Defendant first argues that Plaintiffs Motion is defective because the Plaintiff did not timely file the Affidavit of Service. However, a delay in filing proof of service under CPLR 308 is merely a procedural irregularity, not jurisdictional, and may be corrected nunc pro

KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.

nst Defendant, and states as follows: 1. On May 7, 2008. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a