Epstein Secrets

ument 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 EllackiLlt of DJ D.C. ELE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80736-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. S.D. or FLA. • MIAMI Etners ewe y VICTIM'S PETITI

Government offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government clams that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so thee is no good basis for sealing. (Counse

Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2008 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN 1E: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by— _ D.C. JULY 1 2038 STEVEN 'LLANO.% )RE CLERK U.S. DiST. CT. S.D. OF P.A. • LV. !S. VICTIM'S REPLY TO

Government offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government clams that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so there is no good basis for sealing. (Couns

Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2008 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN 1E: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by— _ D.C. JULY 1 2038 STEVEN 'LLANO.% )RE CLERK U.S. DiST. CT. S.D. OF P.A. • LV. !S. VICTIM'S REPLY TO

Government offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government clams that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so there is no good basis for sealing. (Couns

-KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07, 108 Page 1 of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. ORDER TAKE NOTICE that the above-styled cause has been set for a hearing on Petitioner's Emergency Petition for Enf

overnment offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government claims that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so there is no good basis for sealing. (Couns