Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent, United States of America, by and throu
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent, United States of America, by and thro
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent, United States of America, by and throu
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, I UNITED STATES Respondent. RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent, United States of America, by and throu
of 2009. In light of the underlying settlements between the victims and Mr. Epstein, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED ." (D.E. 38)(emphasis in original). It is not unreasonable to believe that the instant action under the Crime Victims Rights Act was auxiliary litigation to support petit
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (33)
Entities connected to both Scarlett Johansson and D.E. 38)(emphasis
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,425 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON892 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON828 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON628 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
United States
LOCATION525 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Paul Cassell
PERSON379 w/ Scarlett·3 w/ D.E.
the Southern District
LOCATION340 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION142 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION133 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ D.E.
the Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION110 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON87 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Brad Edwards & Associates
ORGANIZATION53 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Hayes
PERSON51 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ D.E.
The Law Offices of
ORGANIZATION42 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
D.E.
ORGANIZATION33 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Ashcroft
PERSON33 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
TW
Twombly
PERSON30 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
OW
Owens
PERSON29 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
Bell Atlantic Corp.
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.
the Circuit Court
ORGANIZATION20 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ D.E.