Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
M Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A SUA SPONTE RU
ed because Movant did not participate personally and substantially in the Epstein matter. Movant Did Not Violate Department of Justice Regulations Department of Justice Regulations The Department of Justice regulation containing post-employment restrictions, 5 C.F.R. §2641.201, states in most pertinent part: (a) Basic prohibi
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
M Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CW-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND
ed because Movant did not participate personally and substantially in the Epstein matter. Movant Did Not Violate Department of Justice Regulations Department of Justice Regulations The Department of Justice regulation containing post-employment restrictions, 5 C.F.R. §2641.201, states in most pertinent part: (a) Basic prohibi
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
M Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CW-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND
ed because Movant did not participate personally and substantially in the Epstein matter. Movant Did Not Violate Department of Justice Regulations Department of Justice Regulations The Department of Justice regulation containing post-employment restrictions, 5 C.F.R. §2641.201, states in most pertinent part: (a) Basic prohibi
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
AM Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. / MOTION TO INTERVENE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A SUM SPONTE
ted because Movant did not participate personally and substantially in the Epstein matter. Maya* Did Not Violate Department of Justice Regulations Department of Justice Regulations The Department of Justice regulation containing post-employment restrictions, 5 C.P.R. §2641.201. states in most pertinent part: (a) Basic prohibi
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (166)
Entities connected to both Scarlett Johansson and Department of Justice Regulations
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,425 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
Kenneth Marra
PERSON892 w/ Scarlett·4 w/ Department
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON828 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
Bradley Edwards
PERSON628 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
United States
LOCATION525 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
George W. Bush
PERSON487 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON420 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON388 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION380 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
Paul Cassell
PERSON379 w/ Scarlett·3 w/ Department
the Southern District
LOCATION340 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON310 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
FBI
ORGANIZATION291 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON266 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION211 w/ Scarlett·5 w/ Department
Marc Rich
PERSON209 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
Alexander Acosta
PERSON205 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION181 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
Bradley Cooper
PERSON171 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON155 w/ Scarlett·2 w/ Department