Epstein Secrets

ally provide a 'lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate. 8. In Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV-80119 MARRA/JOHNSON, the Court sustained Epstein's Fifth Amendment objections to several interrogatories asking Epstein to identify information potentially related to t

e is not a material fact in controversy pursuant to which the Request could lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible evidence. 17. cite to Harrell v. Hense, 2009 Wt. 409875 (C.D.CaI.) could not better support Epstein's argument herein. Harrell involves a matter where the petitioner was EFTA007

M Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16'2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes

783 (11th Cir. 1993). To obtain relief under Rule 55(c), the movant must only make a "bare minimum showing" to support her claim for relief. Jones, Harrell, 858 F.2d 667, 669 (11'h Cir. 1988). In evaluating whether a movant has demonstrated "good cause," courts have considered several potential factor

-KAM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80381-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes

783 (11th Cir. 1993). To obtain relief under Rule 55(c), the movant must only make a "bare minimum showing" to support her claim for relief. Jones. Harrell, 858 F.2d 667, 669 (11'h Cir. 1988). In evaluating whether a movant has demonstrated "good cause," courts have considered several potential factor

ocument 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 7 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Com

the action to state court. The Court finds that the issues of economy, convenience, fairness and comity collectively weigh in favor of remand. See Harrell, 934 F.2d at 205. Comity weighs especially strong, given that the remaining claims are pure state law claims with no connection to federal law. Econ