Epstein Secrets

D STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 101, 09-80591 CH-MARRA Civil Action No. Plaintiff, MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHNSON vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FILED by D.C. (MAKE APR 17 2009 STEVEN M, LARIMORE MERE US. DIST. DT. S.D. OF FLA. MIAMI COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DE

hat Mr. Epstein, including his agents, would have no direct or indirect contact with the victims named on this list. In addiditon, under applicable Florida Bar Rules governing contact by attorneys and their agents with persons represented by counsel, any contact with any of our clients or their family members by

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 013CV80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff; vs. JEFFREY EPSTEI

at Mr. Epstein, including his agents, would have' no direct or indirect contact with the victims named on this list. In addiditon, under applicable Florida Bar Rules governing contact by attorneys and their agents with persons represented by counsel, any contact with any of our clients or their fray members by Mr

D STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 101, 09-80591 CH-MARRA Civil Action No. Plaintiff, MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHNSON vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, FILED by D.C. inn AKE APR 17 2009 STEVEN M. LARIMORE MERV US. DIST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. MIAMI COMPLAINT AND Defendant.

hat Mr. Epstein, including his agents, would have no direct or indirect contact with the victims named on this list. In addiditon, under applicable Florida Bar Rules governing contact by attorneys and their agents with persons represented by counsel, any contact with any of our clients or their family members by

to Take Charge of Property of \4 7/ Epst1 dn to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential ent, in Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893- arra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00795599 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.