Epstein Secrets

Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-NIARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. i EPSTEIN and Defendants, DEFENDANT's MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO

ogatories wherein she lists certain witness that may have knowledge regarding the facts and allegations alleged in her complaint. See page three of Plaintiffs Motion wherein she acknowledges that she allegedly brought two of the other Plaintiffs in related cases to Defendant's home. In particular, the response t

Document 462 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2010 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

Accordingly, Epstein's objection to responding to these requests on the basis of his Fifth Amendment Right against self incrimination is upheld and Plaintiffs Motion is denied. As noted previously, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination is accorded liberal construction," Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 48

Document 462 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2010 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

Accordingly, Epstein's objection to responding to these requests on the basis of his Fifth Amendment Right against self incrimination is upheld and Plaintiffs Motion is denied. As noted previously, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination is accorded "liberal construction," Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 4

TATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, through co

nc. . Boulevard Burgers Corporation, 52 A.D. 3d 1150, 861 N.Y.S. 2d 808 (N.Y.S.C., Appellate Division, June 26, 2008). Defendant first argues that Plaintiffs Motion is defective because the Plaintiff did not timely file the Affidavit of Service. However, a delay in filing proof of service under CPLR 308 is mere