Epstein Secrets

tory at the clerk's office. On October 31, 2005, I responded to the courthouse and filed the paperwork along with an order to seal, signed by Judge Johnson, to deny any release of any paperwork on this case. INV CONTINUES.. F********* ******** * ***************** Reported By: Entered By.: # 13 1

01L 'ase No • 1-05-000368 (Continued) as she ever removed her clothing to provide a massage. CMS advised it wasn't really weird until later on. Miele was stated it was not until the third time she went that she removed her clothing. MeillIkstated she was notified by that Epstein wanted her to

e generally constitutes an accounting method, and a change from one such practice to another generally constitutes a change in accounting method. In Johnson v. Commissioner, 108 T.C. 448 (1997), for example, the Tax Court held that switching the time for recognizing escrowed customer payments as gross i

item, that is, this is a change in the proper time for the taking of a deduction from the year incurred to the year paid." 71 T.C. at 919. See also, Miele v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 284 (1979), Pierce Ditching Co. Inc. v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 301 (1979), Brunton v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-166. I

0 REC 02415401 PAY 03/09/01 03/12401 UNIT@ TECHNOLOGIES CORP ' UTX 600 0.2250 135.00 REC 02416/01 PAY 03410/01 r 03/13101 4,61 JOHNSON5. JOHNSON REC 02R0101 PAY 03413/01 EI Du p&vr «NEMOURS & CO /NJ DO 650 200 0.3200 0.3500 206.00 70.00 RIC 02/15401 PAY 03414401 03416401 DUKE ENER

ddition. 8 brochure explaining the Public Disclosure Program is available from the NASD upon request. 'STOP] End of Statement Caen= neitourae Miele 0490.0 sussOARY Bat Sian Searle's COr9 One Voielech Oster Wart Wool*. May Vat 11201-3248 121212721000 INSTRUTIONAL INTERESTS nienew• me= Detent