Epstein Secrets

ered on FLSD Docket 07/02/2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.

oses of the Lawsuits. 2. Depositions. In addition to the foregoing, pursuant to 45 C.F.R. §164.512 (e) (1) (I) and for purposes of compliance with HIPAA, without waiver of any right to prepayment of costs, fees and expenses associated with copying costs, or any other appropriate objection or privile

tered on FLSD Docket 0702/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.

erapy records. 3. Accordingly, the parties request the entry of the attached Stipulated HIPAA Protective Order to protect Plaintiffs' rights under HIPAA and allow Defendant to receive discovery of protected healthcare information under HIPAA. 3 EFTA00727599 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 185 E

Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 03;022009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

and §90.503, Fla.Evd. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provision of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)." C. Grounds for Objection and Reasons for Motion The substantive basis for Defendant's objection is a claim of privilege under state law, Flori

lstein, P 06:24:38 p.m. 09-12-2008 2 /86 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, 1 l 1O -2' vs. 1 1 ( Via c' esam? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ; AA(' Defendant. el' 231 c ifi n71 AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO D

01 and §90.503, Fla. Stat. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). EFTA00728988 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 10 of 24 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 10 Consti

Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 08)1412009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

s Order. Plaintiffs have otherwise worked cooperatively with Defendant in providing relevant discovery. Plaintiffs' counsel initiated a draft of a HIPAA compliant protective order, which was stipulated by the parties and entered by the Court on July 2, 2009. Additionally, Plaintiffs have provided De

Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 03;022009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

and §90.503, Fla.Evd. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provision of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)." C. Grounds for Objection and Reasons for Motion The substantive basis for Defendant's objection is a claim of privilege under state law, Flori

d Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-Contact Order EFTA00182031 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

t DOC privacy procedures should be directed to the DOC Privacy Officer at . Complaints to DOC about the way DOC handles your PHI, compliance with HIPAA (see footnote, p.1 of this Notice), or if you believe your privacy rights have been violated must be filed as Offender Grievances pursuant to Rule 3

d Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-Contact Order EFTA01625662 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

t DOC privacy procedures should be directed to the DOC Privacy Officer at . Complaints to DOC about the way DOC handles your PHI, compliance with HIPAA (see footnote, p.1 of this Notice), or if you believe your privacy rights have been violated must be filed as Offender Grievances pursuant to Rule 3