Epstein Secrets

R THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 101, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 09 - 8059 1 Civil Action No. CIV-MARRP MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHNSON Etrpy ,fir DC INTAKE APR 1 7 2009 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. OIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. MIAMI COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIA

or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or if such visual depiction has actually been transported in Interstate or foreign commerce or mailed. 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (2002) (emphasis added). As with § 2423(b), however, Congress made significant changes to the statu

ection2d22(b); all in violation oflitIc IS, United Mahn Code, Section knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to travel in Interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sans./ conduct as defined in It U.S.C. § 2423(0. with minor female., in violation of Tide United St

udicial discretion of the trial court and that there will be no reversal on appeal except for a clear a se of that ir discretion. United States Johnson, 1946, 327 U.S. 1( , 66 S.Ct. 4 4, 90 L.Ed. 3 562; Connelly United States, 8 Cir., ( 9, 271 F.2d , cert. denied, Caudle United States, 1958,

ctice of prostitution. or to give herself up to debauchery. or any other immoral practice, whereby any such woman or girl shall be transported in Interstate or foreign commerce, or in the District of Columbia or any Territory or ion of the United States— "Shall be fined not more than $3,000 or impris

having persuaded. in- duced, enticed and caused Miss Hull to go from Minneapolis to New York for the aforesaid purposes' Joan flail for travel in Interstate coin. mew* from .Minneapolis-St. Paul Inter- national Airport. Weld Chamberlain Field, District of Minnesota. to New York City, State of New York.

hort period in prison for punishment or other purposes but still needs supervision and trainin programs after release.")); see also United States Johnson. 529 U.S. 53. 59 (2000) ("The objectives of supervised release would be unfulfilled if excess prison time were to offset and reduce terms of super

, § 2, cl. 2, as sources of that power.") (citations omitted). Indeed, the Supreme Court has commented on the "very different applications" of the Interstate and Indian Commerce Clause powers, explaining that interstate commerce jurisprudence "is premised on a structur- al understanding of the unique rol

tory at the clerk's office. On October 31, 2005, I responded to the courthouse and filed the paperwork along with an order to seal, signed by Judge Johnson, to deny any release of any paperwork on this case. INV CONTINUES.. *********************** ********** NA T I E # 13 Reported By: PARKINSON

n to the supervision the authorities 's I plan to live to been placed I would Eilvi change Race: • . whiil ._._, from f rules of the Interstate be subject ton (receiving to whom DOB: j. (sending state) to Commission to in this state. I agree state) will this application is at (full