Epstein Secrets

8 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 2 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 4. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, had a residence located in Palm Beach C

abuse of a minor child. The Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of the Plaintiff, C.M.A.'s minority. 17. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, entered pleas of "g

ment 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, VS. PSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF C.M.A.'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING TREATMENT RECORDS FROM AND INCOR AND

uction of these confidential and private treatment records would only serve to further humiliate, embarrass, and victimize C.M.A . 9. Furthermore, C.M.A.'s treatment records from the Inc. and are protected by the psychotherapist-patient privilege pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Jaffee v.

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO.2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.; 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.3, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO.4, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHN

xpert discovery must be completed on June 29, 2009 for C.M.A. 6. As to C.M.A., Jane Doe and Jane Does 2-7, each has objected to relevant discovery. C.M.A. has even refused to produce certain information that she agreed to produce in discovery. The foregoing delay tactics has prevented Epstein from co

ed on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 1 of 20 #281849/clw UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff(s), vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendant(s). NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintif

e Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Tel: (561) 202-6360 Subject matter: Defendant 3. C.M.A.'s attorneys: Jack Scarola, Esq. and Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm B

t 147-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff(s), VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendant(s). / PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURE COMES NOW the Plaintiff, C.M.A.

Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Tel: (561) 202-6360 Subject matter: Defendant 3. do C.M.A.'s attorneys: Jack Scarola, Esq. and Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm B

Docket 06/26/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO.2, Plaintiff, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON vs. JEYPREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO.3, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO.4

is Court subsequently denied on December 12, 2008 (DE 28). The case was transferred from Judge Zloch to this division on September 3, 2008 (DE 21). C.M.A. filed her First Amended Complaint on February 10, 2009. (C.M.A. DE 39-40). Epstein's Motion to Dismiss same was filed on March 12, 2009. (C.M.A. DE

ment 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM

A/JOHNSON, in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss directed to Plaintiff C.M.A.'s Amended Complaint, Plaintiff C.M.A.'s Response, and Defendant's reply to C.M.A.'s response (which has yet to be filed). In this action, Plaintiffs Complaint attempts to allege a cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 - Civ

3 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 2 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 4. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, had a residence located in Palm Beach C

Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRAMOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff(s), VS. TEIN and Defendant(s). FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue COMES NOW the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and brings

ered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.

ity under the agreement is supposed to be admitted. Now, as to the amount of damages, there are legal issues that will be before you and under the C.M.A. cases that are getting before you, as to whether it is 50 or 150. That has nothing to do with the NPA. There are legal issues that are before you a

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Frebaiyi ciO4400 D.C. ELECT PrONIC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE

r the 9 agreement is supposed to be admitted. Now, as to the amount of 10 damages, there are legal issues that will be before you and 11 under the C.M.A. cases that are getting before you, as to 12 whether it is 50 or 150. That has nothing to do with the NPA. 13 There are legal issues that are befor