Epstein Secrets

white tiles. The eastern most driveway is separated by a large white in color concrete wall with black in color numbers "358" clearly displayed from El Brillo and leads to the east side of the residence. On the east side of residence, there are three single car garage doors, which are white in color and a

rillo Way. At El Brillo Way, make a right or westbound turn and travel approximately .1 (one tenth) of a mile to the last house on the South side of El Brillo clearly marked with the number 358. The premises desired to be searched is two story, single family residence made of CBS construction. The residen

shed the subpoena in its entirety, without prejudice to the grand jury's ability to issue a properly narrowed subpoena. Id. at 13-14. See also In re Amato, 2005 WL 1429743 at *11-1'12 (D.Me. June 17, 2005)(granting motion to quash with respect to paragraph of subpoena requesting production of all comp

ppear before the grand jury and to bring with him: 1. All computer equipment and electronic storage media removed from the residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach Florida, including but not limited to central processing units ("CPUs?), laptop computers, keyboards, printers, modems, routers, h

ssue unnecessarily demanded documents irrelevant to the grand jury inquiry and was, therefore, unreasonably broad under Rule 17. Likewise, in In re Amato, 2005 WL 1429743 at *11-*12 (D. Me. June 17, 2005), the Court, relying on a number of cases dealing with searches of computers pursuant to warrants

ppear before the grand jury and to bring with him: 1. All computer equipment and electronic storage media removed from the residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach Florida, including but not limited to central processing units ("CPUs"), laptop computers, keyboards, printers, modems, routers, h

ssue unnecessarily demanded documents irrelevant to the grand jury inquiry and was, therefore, unreasonably broad under Rule 17. Likewise, in In re Amato, 2005 WL 1429743 at *11-*12 (D. Me. June 17, 2005), the Court, relying on a number of cases dealing with searches of computers pursuant to warrants