Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
ability analysis in this case," however, "is predicated on an assessment of the actions that might have been taken by third parties," such as Judge Preska and the Miami Herald, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
ability analysis in this case," however, "is predicated on an assessment of the actions that might have been taken by third parties," such as Judge Preska and the Miami Herald, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
ability analysis in this case," however, "is predicated on an assessment of the actions that might have been taken by third parties," such as Judge Preska and the Miami Herald, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00019003
arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
Page: EFTA00019003 →Page EFTA00019007
ability analysis in this case," however, "is predicated on an assessment of the actions that might have been taken by third parties," such as Judge Preska and the Miami Herald, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every
Page: EFTA00019007 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (65)
Entities connected to both MetroPCS and Loretta A. Preska
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON13 w/ MetroPCS·65 w/ Loretta
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ MetroPCS·69 w/ Loretta
David Boies
PERSON4 w/ MetroPCS·37 w/ Loretta
Julie K. Brown
PERSON3 w/ MetroPCS·36 w/ Loretta
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON9 w/ MetroPCS·24 w/ Loretta
Prince Andrew
PERSON3 w/ MetroPCS·28 w/ Loretta
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ MetroPCS·27 w/ Loretta
Stephen Hawking
PERSON5 w/ MetroPCS·21 w/ Loretta
SW
Sweet
PERSON4 w/ MetroPCS·21 w/ Loretta
Schiller
PERSON4 w/ MetroPCS·20 w/ Loretta
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON4 w/ MetroPCS·18 w/ Loretta
the Southern District
LOCATION3 w/ MetroPCS·18 w/ Loretta
George W. Bush
PERSON2 w/ MetroPCS·19 w/ Loretta
United States
LOCATION6 w/ MetroPCS·15 w/ Loretta
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON4 w/ MetroPCS·16 w/ Loretta
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
ORGANIZATION4 w/ MetroPCS·14 w/ Loretta
Carpenter
PERSON5 w/ MetroPCS·13 w/ Loretta
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON4 w/ MetroPCS·13 w/ Loretta
Denver
LOCATION2 w/ MetroPCS·15 w/ Loretta
LB
Leon Black
PERSON3 w/ MetroPCS·13 w/ Loretta