21
Total Mentions
5
Documents
2
Connected Entities
MetroPCS appears exclusively as the wireless carrier provider in phone call detail records from 2006, showing up in document headers rather than as an entity connected to the Epstein investigation.
All mentions are in the headers of phone record spreadsheets labeled 'MetroPCS Call Detail for [phone number]' covering call logs from January through July 2006. One mention appears in document EFTA00018997 discussing the Carpenter v. United States Supreme Court case about cell-site location data privacy, where MetroPCS and Sprint historical records were referenced in the legal precedent. The company itself had no direct connection to Epstein—it was simply the telecommunications provider whose records were obtained during the investigation.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
17 27 51 0 40 0 28 45 45 0 22 0 3 39 39 12 13 6 38 9 18 8 10 44 44 0 2 7 9 37 38 9 EFTA00006775 --- PAGE BREAK --- MetroPCS Can Detail for 16980 -125pgs 1-1-06 to 8-1-06.xls Page 4 of 125 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME DIALED NUMBER DEST NUMBER DIR SF MM SEC CALLER ID
Page: EFTA00006776 →17 27 51 0 40 0 28 45 45 0 22 0 3 39 39 12 13 6 38 9 18 8 10 44 44 0 2 7 9 37 38 9 EFTA00006775 --- PAGE BREAK --- MetroPCS Can Detail for 16980 -125pgs 1-1-06 to 8-1-06.xls Page 4 of 125 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME DIALED NUMBER DEST NUMBER DIR SF MM SEC CALLER ID
Page: EFTA00006776 →17 27 51 0 40 0 28 45 45 0 22 0 3 39 39 12 13 6 38 9 18 8 10 44 44 0 2 7 9 37 38 9 EFTA00006775 --- PAGE BREAK --- MetroPCS Can Detail for 16980 -125pgs 1-1-06 to 8-1-06.xls Page 4 of 125 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME DIALED NUMBER DEST NUMBER DIR SF MM SEC CALLER ID
Page: EFTA00006776 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 125pgs 1-1-06 to 8-1-06.xls Page 98 of 125 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME 6/16/2006 20:43:50 6/16/2006 20:43:50 6/16/2006 21:08:
Page: EFTA00006870 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 125pgs 1-1-06 to 8-1-06.xls Page 98 of 125 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME 6/16/2006 20:43:50 6/16/2006 20:43:50 6/16/2006 21:08:
Page: EFTA00006870 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 125pgs 1-1-06 to 8-1-06.xls Page 98 of 125 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME 6/16/2006 20:43:50 6/16/2006 20:43:50 6/16/2006 21:08:
Page: EFTA00006870 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 169E:0 -179pgs 1-1-06 to 7-19-06.x1s Page 75 of 179 [BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME DIALED NUMBER DEST NUMBER DIR SF MM SEC CALLE
Page: EFTA00006970 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 169E:0 -179pgs 1-1-06 to 7-19-06.x1s Page 75 of 179 [BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME DIALED NUMBER DEST NUMBER DIR SF MM SEC CALLE
Page: EFTA00006970 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 169E:0 -179pgs 1-1-06 to 7-19-06.x1s Page 75 of 179 [BILLED PHONE CALL DATE TIME DIALED NUMBER DEST NUMBER DIR SF MM SEC CALLE
Page: EFTA00006970 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 16980 -179pgs 1-1-06 to 7-19-06.xls Page 175 of 179 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006
Page: EFTA00007070 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 16980 -179pgs 1-1-06 to 7-19-06.xls Page 175 of 179 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006
Page: EFTA00007070 →MetroPCS Call Detail for 16980 -179pgs 1-1-06 to 7-19-06.xls Page 175 of 179 BILLED PHONE CALL DATE 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006 7/16/2006
Page: EFTA00007070 →arpenter v. United States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as t
Page: EFTA00019003 →