Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (126)
Entities connected to both Department of Justice and E.D. Pa.1988
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON2,961 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
United States
LOCATION1,116 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
the Southern District
LOCATION982 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
Alexander Acosta
PERSON948 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.
FBI
ORGANIZATION813 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON517 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.
New York
LOCATION473 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON443 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON392 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON380 w/ Department·3 w/ E.D.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION324 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON312 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
George Mitchell
PERSON305 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
Marc Rich
PERSON295 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON272 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON261 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
Colorado
LOCATION234 w/ Department·4 w/ E.D.
Samantha Power
PERSON233 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON213 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION205 w/ Department·2 w/ E.D.