4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense
Entities connected to both Department of Justice and Gov't Bail Letter

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Samantha Power
PERSONGerald Lefcourt
PERSON
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION