Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
In this regard, the Court agrees with Plaintiffs' Counsel that the judge presiding over the state court case and the appropriate decision maker in the Internal Justice Department Complaint procedure are the ones best suited to make the determination of admissibility as it relates to their respective cases. In so ruling the C
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (22)
Entities connected to both Department of Justice and the Internal Justice Department
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON2,961 w/ Department·5 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON517 w/ Department·5 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON503 w/ Department·5 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON443 w/ Department·5 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON380 w/ Department·5 w/ the
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION205 w/ Department·5 w/ the
CH
Chambers
PERSON54 w/ Department·5 w/ the
SR
Scott Rothstein
PERSON51 w/ Department·5 w/ the
JN
JANE DOE NO
PERSON15 w/ Department·5 w/ the
the State Court
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Department·5 w/ the
D.E.
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Department·5 w/ the
Justice Department Complaint
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Department·5 w/ the
CH
Chmielarz
PERSON5 w/ Department·5 w/ the
the Florida Rules of Evidence
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Department·5 w/ the
the Final Judgment
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Department·5 w/ the
See American Disability Assn.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Department·5 w/ the
LINNEA
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Department·3 w/ the
ER
Epstein I. Rothstein
PERSON3 w/ Department·3 w/ the
RJ
R. JOHN
PERSON3 w/ Department·3 w/ the
internal Justice Department Proceeding
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Department·3 w/ the