Back to Network
10
Shared Docs
10
Same-Page
10 / 10
Mentions
Document Mentions (10 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the victims have specifically alleged in their summary judgment motion — without any contradiction from the Government — "[i]t was a deviation from the Justice Department's standard practice to negotiate with [Epstein's] defense counsel about the extent of crime victim notifications." DE #48 at 15. To the extent that
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the victims have specifically alleged in their summary judgment motion — without any contradiction from the Government — "[i]t was a deviation from the Justice Department's standard practice to negotiate with [Epstein's] defense counsel about the extent of crime victim notifications." DE #48 at 15. To the extent that
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Counsel to file the subject Correspondence he wishes to make public under seal with the appropriate institution (e.g. the State Court proceeding and the Justice Department), and obtain a ruling from that institution on the use to which such Correspondence can be put, said Motion is granted. However, to the extent Epste
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sed "undisputed material facts" are in fact disputed and, in many cases, wrong. 2The U.S. Attorney's Office also repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the SpecialResponsibilitie
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sed "undisputed material facts" are in fact disputed and, in many cases, wrong. 2The U.S. Attorney's Office also repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the SpecialResponsibilitie
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
sed "undisputed material facts" arc in fact disputed and, in many cases, wrong. 'The U.S. Attorney's Office also repeatedly reminded Mr. Cassell of the Justice Department's policy not to comment on the guilt or innocence of an unconvicted person. The ABA's Model Rule of Professional Conduct on the Special Responsibiliti
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (158)
Entities connected to both Department of Justice and Justice Department Complaint
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON2,961 w/ Department·17 w/ Justice
United States
LOCATION1,116 w/ Department·9 w/ Justice
Prince Andrew
PERSON1,106 w/ Department·7 w/ Justice
the Southern District
LOCATION982 w/ Department·3 w/ Justice
LB
Leon Black
PERSON746 w/ Department·5 w/ Justice
George W. Bush
PERSON689 w/ Department·6 w/ Justice
Kenneth Marra
PERSON517 w/ Department·17 w/ Justice
Bradley Edwards
PERSON503 w/ Department·17 w/ Justice
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON511 w/ Department·3 w/ Justice
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON443 w/ Department·17 w/ Justice
Julie K. Brown
PERSON448 w/ Department·2 w/ Justice
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON418 w/ Department·3 w/ Justice
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON380 w/ Department·17 w/ Justice
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON318 w/ Department·12 w/ Justice
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION324 w/ Department·5 w/ Justice
RB
Roy Black
PERSON318 w/ Department·3 w/ Justice
Paul Cassell
PERSON268 w/ Department·11 w/ Justice
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON272 w/ Department·6 w/ Justice
Barry Diller
PERSON244 w/ Department·3 w/ Justice
Samantha Power
PERSON233 w/ Department·3 w/ Justice