4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
y reference in the substantive charge (Count 2, ¶ 23). Beyond that, Mr. Epstein intends to raise and litigate significant due process issues about the Department of Justice's conduct in this case. Namely, there is irrefutable evidence from the pending CVRA litigation in the Southern District of Florida that, after Mr. Eps
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
Entities connected to both Department of Justice and Fiero

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Samantha Power
PERSON