Epstein Secrets

7 Tenn Sheet for Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement 5 Undated File folder entitled 'Meeting Timeline' with contents 6 7/24/2006 Letter from Chief Reiter to victims informing them of FBI investigation 7 7/26/2006 South Florida Sun-Sentinel Article Regarding Chief Reiter's referral of case to FBI 8

NS 6(e) MATERIAL EFTA00225427 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/1/2006 State Attorney • ga y E B ' Krischer Michael S. Reiter, Chief of Police for Town of Palm Beach Letter urging State Attorney to proceed with probable cause affidavits and cast filing packages or to re

Timeline' with contents 6 7/24/2006 Letter from Chief Reiter to victims informing them of FBI investigation 7

I told them that, if the evidence was there, it was a case that could be prosecuted federally. Det. Recarey then told me that his boss - PBPD Chief Michael Reiter — was still pressing the State Attorney's Office to arrest Epstein. d p ' of probable cause affidavits for the arrests of Jeffrey Epstein, and

in employees — Janusz Banasiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi

ttorney Barry Krischer were not returned today. Chief Reiter has not been happy with lCrischer's handling of t

ch police thought there was probable cause to charge Epstein with unlawful sex acts with a minor and lewd and lascivious molestation. Police Chief Michael Reiter was so angry with State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case that he wrote a memo suggesting the county's top prosecutor disqualify himse

g of this matter has taken and consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases," Reiter wrote in a May 1 memo to Krischer. While not commenting specifically on the Epstein case, Mike Edmondson, spokesman for the state attorney, said hi

521-23. Interestingly, in that case, the government conceded that "the leaking of privileged materials to investigators would raise the specter of Kastigar-like evidentiary hearings". Id. at 517. This case presents the same specter should Mr. Epstein be indicted. The recognized importance of the attorn

d, but I told them that, if the evidence was there, it was I case that could be prosecuted federally. Det. then told me that his boss - PBPD Chief Michael — was still pressing the State Attorney's Office to arrest Epstein. Det. had prepared series of probable cause affidavits for the arrests of Jeffre

nusz Banasiak and Mucinska. Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, Mr. Banasiak was satisfied with I standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to thi

hael Sa In ick One Clearlakc Centre 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1203 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5014 Re: Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Dear Michael: I am in receipt of your letter regarding Janusz Banasiak. As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Banasiak is not a target of the grand jury investigation and

bpoenaed solely as a witness. During our last conversation, you stated that Mr. Banasiak would be willing to speak with investigators pursuant to a Kastigar letter. Please let me know if that is the case and, if so, when you and Mr. Banasiak are available. My office would rightly question why I would as

chael Sal nick One Clearlake Centre 250 South Australian Avenue Suite 1203 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5014 Re: Federal Grand Jury Subpoena Dear Michael: I am in receipt of your letter regarding Janusz Banasiak. As I mentioned earlier, Mr. Banasiak is not a target of the grand jury investigation and

bpoenaed solely as a witness. During our last conversation, you stated that Mr. Banasiak would be willing to speak with investigators pursuant to a Kastigar letter. Please let me know if that is the case and, if so, when you and Mr. Banasiak are available. My office would rightly question why I would as