Epstein Secrets

sertion of fact. See DE362-21. The second sentence is denied because it was Epstein's attorneys, not the United States Attorney's Office, who asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Department of Justice, to review the case. See DE362-16 at 6, 7 (Bates Nos. RFP MR 000505, 000506). 92. The first sentence of paragraph 92 is admi

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Petitioners' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, and states: I. Admitted.' 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. The first sentence of paragraph 4 is admitted. As to the second sentence, respondent adm

sertion of fact. See DE362-21. The second sentence is denied because it was Epstein's attorneys, not the United States Attorney's Office, who asked the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Department of Justice, to review the case. See DE362-16 at 6, 7 (Bates Nos. RFP MR 000505, 000506). 92. The first sentence of paragraph 92 is admi

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Petitioners' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, and states: I. Admitted.' 2. Admitted. 3. Admitted. 4. The first sentence of paragraph 4 is admitted. As to the second sentence, respondent adm

61 at 31-32, 1 94; See Gov't Fact. Resp., DE 407 at 12, 1 94. In January 2008, Jane Doe 1 met with the line prosecutor and an attorney employed by the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the U.S. Department of Justice. See Gov't Fact. Resp., DE 407 at 13, 1 97. During that meeting, Jane Doe 1 expressed her view that Epstein 9 EF

whereby the federal prosecutors would defer federal prosecution in favor of a Florida state prosecution. Gov't Resp. to Petitioners' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (hereinafter "Gov't Fact Resp."), DE 407 at 5, 1 38. The NPA gave Epstein a promise that he would not be prosecuted in the Southern District of Flor