Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ndividuals the Government considered to be victims or potential victims at the time it negotiated the non-prosecution agreement. As indicated in the Table, the Government should confer with Petitioners regarding the names of the individuals identified in these documents. If Petitioners have not been p
cipation of either in the instant litigation. ' The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ndividuals the Government considered to be victims or potential victims at the time it negotiated the non-prosecution agreement. As indicated in the Table, the Government should confer with Petitioners regarding the names of the individuals identified in these documents. If Petitioners have not been p
ticipation of either in the instant litigation. The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ndividuals the Government considered to be victims or potential victims at the time it negotiated the non-prosecution agreement. As indicated in the Table, the Government should confer with Petitioners regarding the names of the individuals identified in these documents. If Petitioners have not been p
cipation of either in the instant litigation. ° The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ndividuals the Government considered to be victims or potential victims at the time it negotiated the non-prosecution agreement. As indicated in the Table, the Government should confer with Petitioners regarding the names of the individuals identified in these documents. If Petitioners have not been p
cipation of either in the instant litigation. ' The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (64)
Entities connected to both Table and the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ Table·24 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION5 w/ Table·23 w/ the
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Table·22 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Table·21 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·15 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Table·15 w/ the
The Eighth Circuit
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Table·15 w/ the
Main Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·6 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON5 w/ Table·5 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION2 w/ Table·8 w/ the
WA
Wayte
PERSON5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
ST
Subpoena Duces Tecum
PERSON5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
HI
Hickman
PERSON5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
Intervenor Epstein's Motion for the Court to Protect From Disclosure Grand
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
the United States Attorneys
LOCATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
Atlanta Gas Light Co.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
State Farm Ins
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
the Executive Office's
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the
Miller & Marcus
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Table·4 w/ the