4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 11
Mentions
Article: Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute
and institutional capacity (such as the advent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation) expanded in response to states’ inability to con
> See, e.g., id. at 17-19 (providing examples of the Justice Department's prosecution of state and local officials). 56 Td
seek review of prosecutors' decisions within the Department of Justice hierarchy, although it also explicitly bars judic
- victims - to prosecute alleged criminal wrongdoing. Redundant charging authority takes other forms as well. In large hierarchical agencies such as the U.S. Department of Justice, internal administrative review of front-line prosecutors’ charging or declination decisions by higher-ups creates a version of redundant enforcement
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512 →ive review somewhat comparable to those in E.U. member states. Federal law grants victims a right to seek review of prosecutors' decisions within the Department of Justice hierarchy, although it also explicitly bars judicial review of Justice Department decisions in this process. !!4 Although decision makers in an inter
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016526 →n of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communications, the report says, w
l bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Tr
bert Mueller’s investigation may face a serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by antecedent political bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communicati
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273 →n of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communications, the report says, w
l bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026477 --- PAGE BREAK --- insp
ert Mueller’s investigation may face a serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by antecedent political bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026477 --- PAGE BREAK --- inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal Burea
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026477 →ainst Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly referred to as the "United States") have
E.W. and a federal court action on behalf of Jane Doe. All of the cases were filed in the summer of 2008, 3. My clients received correspondence from the U.S. Department of Justice regarding their rights as victims of Epstein’s federal sex offenses. (True and accurate copies of the letters are attached to Statement of Undisputed
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013363 →Entities connected to both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON