Epstein Secrets

pt the relevant rule of New York landlord-tenant law for purposes of deciding the remaining issue in this dis- pute, and hold that, consistent with New York law, OFM was entitled to arbitrarily withhold its consent to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to Fisher. Even assum- ing OFM had a hidden a

d in part and denied in part. I. Federal Courts .3=409 In diversity action, federal court sitting in New York must apply New York law, including New York's choice-of-law rules. 2. Contracts e=s144 Under New York's choice-of-law rules, when court is construing meaning of con- tract, court should apply

t may not be introduced to create ambiguity. Arthur M. Handler, Whitman & Ransom, New York City, for plaintiff. Elliot Silverman, Cold & Wachtel, New York City, for defendant. ORDER CONBOY, District Judge: We have before us an action for breach of contract. Plaintiff Michael R. Stroll ("Stroll") see

S, et al., Plaintiff, I ST. MARY'S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.AW—02-2449. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. June 13, 2003. Landowner brought action against county commissioners and individuals for violations of due process rights and a tak- ing under t

oan flail for travel in Interstate coin. mew* from .Minneapolis-St. Paul Inter- national Airport. Weld Chamberlain Field, District of Minnesota. to New York City, State of New York. for the purpose of prostitution, debauchery and other immoral Perimists, and with in- tent on the part of Herold Lee sateen to

d re- turned, that she made the trip from Minneapolis to New York without in- ducement, enticement or persuasion by the defendant; that she went to New York to run away from her problems; that she did not know what she would be doing in New York; that although she did have sexual adventures in New York

States District ord in this case is sufficient to support Court for the Northern District of Call- the conviction of the defendant Cousins fognia, Southern Division, Michael J. on the conspiracy count; and since a per- Roche, J., rendered judgment, and de- son cannot conspire with himself or her- fendant appea

ihu Root and William D. Guthrie, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Jacob Hoffman Brewing Co. Guggenheimer, Untermyer & Marshall, of New York City (Elihu Root and William D. Guthrie, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Clausen-Flanagan Brewery. •526 Fitch & Grant, of New York Cit

7 accordingly been issued restraining the United States attorney and the acting and deputy collector of internal revenue of the Third district of New York from enforcing, pending final hearing, certain acts of Congress. It seems to me that the rulings made are contrary to the powers of a court of equ

rt hereof; that said letter and communication was duly carried by the United States mail for de- livery into the City and County of San Francisco, Southern Division of the North- ern District of California, according to the direction thereon." The exhibited letter plainly threatens injury to the addressee Joe