Epstein Secrets

etermination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by complying with non-

f criminal proceedings, "a party bears the heavy burden of demonstrating that there would be a clear case of hardship if a stay did not issue." GLL GmbH & Co. Messeturm KG v. La Vecchia, 247 F.R.D. 231, 233 (D. Me. 2008) (internal quotations omitted). Epstein's motion fails for at least three reasons. Fir

etermination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by complying with non-

f criminal proceedings, "a party bears the heavy burden of demonstrating that there would be a clear case of hardship if a stay did hot issue." GLL GmbH & Co. Messeturm KG v. La Vecchia, 247 F.R.D. 231, 233 (D. Me. 2008) (internal quotations omitted). Epstein's motion fails for at least three reasons. Fir

determination that Epstein had violated the agreement could the U.S. Attorney's Office move forward to prosecute Epstein. See generally Santobellol. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Finally and most fundamentally, Epstein has it entirely within his power to avoid criminal prosecution by complying with non-

f criminal proceedings, "a party bears the heavy burden of demonstrating that there would be a clear case of hardship if a stay did not issue." GLL GmbH & Co. Messeturm KG1 LaVecchia, 247 F.R.D. 231, 233 (D. Me. 2008) (internal quotations omitted). Epstein's motion fails for at least three reasons. First,