Epstein Secrets

e when substituted service is used to serve a defendant. While Rule 4(eX1) allows Plaintiff to serve process on Defendant in the method permitted by New York, Rule 4(e)(I) does not alter the twenty day period specified by Rule 12(a). In other words, under Rules 4(e)(1) and 12(a), the Court is not bound by

Rule 4(e)(I) does not alter the twenty day period specified by Rule 12(a). In other words, under Rules 4(e)(1) and 12(a), the Court is not bound by New York's proof of service filing requirement nor New York's "completion" date in determining when Defendant's answer needed to be filed. Beller & Keller" Ty

nt 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16'2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Cou

the name and/or address of a victim of a sexual crime are presumed to be confidential and exempt from public access. Id. Similarly, upon approving New York's rape shield law, then Governor Mario Cuomo stated, "sexual assault victims have unfortunately had to endure a terrible invasion of their physical p

ally Bereaved Girl at Age Sixteen Months" (With Thomas Lopez, Ph.D.), in The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, Volume 34, The New York Times Press, New York, 1979. 24. "Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood," in Gerber, I., Wiener, A., Kutscher, A., et al., Perspectives on Bereavement, MSS Informati

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-801 I 9-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plainti

ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe

e. MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, Jane Doe No. 4, I believe, is going to speak now. JANE DOE NO. 4: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. JANE DOE NO. 4: I just have something very short to say. I met Jeffrey Epstein at a very vulnerable place in my life, and whatever the outcome is with everythin

ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe

e. MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, Jane Doe No. 4, I believe, is going to speak now. JANE DOE NO. 4: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. JANE DOE NO. 4: I just have something very short to say. I met Jeffrey Epstein at a very vulnerable place in my life, and whatever the outcome is with everythin

the name and/or address of a victim of a sexual crime are presumed to be confidential and exempt from public access. Id. Similarly, upon approving New York's rape shield law, then Governor Mario Cuomo stated, "sexual assault victims have unfortunately had to endure a terrible invasion of their physical p

ES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plainti

ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe

e very welcome. Your Honor, Jane Doe No. 4, I believe, is going to speak now. JANE DOE NO. 4: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. JANE DOE NO. 4: I just have something very short to say. I met Jeffrey Epstein at a very vulnerable place in my life, and whatever the outcome is with everythin

ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe

e. MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, Jane Doe No. 4, I believe, is going to speak now. JANE DOE NO. 4: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. JANE DOE NO. 4: I just have something very short to say. I met Jeffrey Epstein at a very vulnerable place in my life, and whatever the outcome is with everythin

ting in good the Florida prosecutors and and that no competent faith with the prosecutors would have ever agreed to a deal back then that allowed New York prosecutors to indict for precisely the same conduct in the future, which, of course, is what happened. In addition, we have come up with very powe

e. MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, Jane Doe No. 4, I believe, is going to speak now. JANE DOE NO. 4: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. JANE DOE NO. 4: I just have something very short to say. I met Jeffrey Epstein at a very vulnerable place in my life, and whatever the outcome is with everythin

rman ("Sherman"), Hoffenberg's uncle, vice-president. At DCC, Sherman had blank checks available for Hof- fenberg and put up the money to start Her New York and had made payments on Hoffenberg's apartment and boat mortgage. Stratford started op- erations in late December 1993 by taking on a few collecti

t 06/10/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, JEFFREY