Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
States must prove that the defendant "had formed the intent to engage in sexual activity with a minor when he crossed state lines." United States v. Hersh , 297 F.3d 1233, 1246 (11th Cir. 2002). See also United States v. Han , 230 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2000) (defendant could be convicted of violating Sect
d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 10
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tates must prove that the defendant "had formed the intent to engage in sexual activity with a minor when he crossed state lines." United States v. Hersh , 297 F.3d 1233, 1246 (11th Cir. 2002). See also United States v. Han , 230 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2000) (defendant could be convicted of violating Sect
d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
States must prove that the defendant "had formed the intent to engage in sexual activity with a minor when he crossed state lines." United States v. Hersh , 297 F.3d 1233, 1246 (11th Cir. 2002). See also United States v. Han , 230 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2000) (defendant could be convicted of violating Sect
egal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. EFTA00229910 United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Yang , 128 F.3d 10
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tates must prove that the defendant "had formed the intent to engage in sexual activity with a minor when he crossed state lines." United States v. Hersh , 297 F.3d 1233, 1246 (11th Cir. 2002). See also United States v. Han , 230 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2000) (defendant could be convicted of violating Sect
d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (121)
Entities connected to both Seymour Hersh and Hayward
United States
LOCATION9 w/ Seymour·18 w/ Hayward
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Seymour·19 w/ Hayward
Marc Rich
PERSON14 w/ Seymour·13 w/ Hayward
Cleveland
LOCATION6 w/ Seymour·18 w/ Hayward
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON5 w/ Seymour·18 w/ Hayward
LB
Leon Black
PERSON7 w/ Seymour·15 w/ Hayward
Mortensen
PERSON6 w/ Seymour·16 w/ Hayward
Philadelphia
LOCATION6 w/ Seymour·15 w/ Hayward
EL
Ellis
PERSON5 w/ Seymour·16 w/ Hayward
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Seymour·12 w/ Hayward
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON10 w/ Seymour·9 w/ Hayward
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON6 w/ Seymour·13 w/ Hayward
GA
Garcia-Lopez
PERSON5 w/ Seymour·13 w/ Hayward
CW
Courtney Wild
PERSON9 w/ Seymour·8 w/ Hayward
Jacksonville
LOCATION5 w/ Seymour·12 w/ Hayward
Naomi Campbell
PERSON7 w/ Seymour·10 w/ Hayward
George W. Bush
PERSON6 w/ Seymour·9 w/ Hayward
ME
Meacham
PERSON5 w/ Seymour·10 w/ Hayward
Northern Region
LOCATION5 w/ Seymour·10 w/ Hayward
EV
Evans
PERSON4 w/ Seymour·11 w/ Hayward