Epstein Secrets

atters), the extradition should not take place". 33. Although some of the conduct alleged in the superseding indictment is said to have occurred in Londonm, three of the `specified matters' are likely to weigh heavily against a finding that extradition would be barred by forum. First, it appears that th

ity in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin); [2007] QB 727: the extradition of the Islatwest Three', one of the first cases US cases to proceed under the Extradition Act 2003. EFTA00065621 Annex C EFTA00065622 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SO

atters), the extradition should not take place". 33. Although some of the conduct alleged in the superseding indictment is said to have occurred in Londonm, three of the `specified matters' are likely to weigh heavily against a finding that extradition would be barred by forum. First, it appears that th

ity in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin); [2007] QB 727: the extradition of the Islatwest Three', one of the first cases US cases to proceed under the Extradition Act 2003. EFTA00154433 Annex C EFTA00154434 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SO

atters), the extradition should not take place". 33. Although some of the conduct alleged in the superseding indictment is said to have occurred in Londonm, three of the `specified matters' are likely to weigh heavily against a finding that extradition would be barred by forum. First, it appears that th

ity in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin); [2007] QB 727: the extradition of the Islatwest Three', one of the first cases US cases to proceed under the Extradition Act 2003. EFTA00073565 Annex C EFTA00073566 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SO