9
Shared Docs
9
Same-Page
9 / 9
Mentions
cial counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing criminal investigation — before Trump's election as U.S. president. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029505 --- PAGE BREAK --- Nader's story is yet another example of the sleaze, greed, and influence-peddling that has come to seem ordinary in Trump-era Washington. But it also offer
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029506 →ives of foreign governments is to keep the United States on their side. Traditionally, this is done through formal discussions with U.S. officials at the State Department, National Security Council, and Department of Defense; meetings with members of Congress; writing op-eds in influential media outlets; and informal c
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029506 →ns verdict is due on four alleged Hezbollah members accused of killing former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri in 2005." Reuters (8/4, Nakhoul, Nader) reports that by Tuesday night, the death toll had risen to 78, with "nearly 4,000" injured, and "officials said they expected the death toll to ris
l ambitions." State Department Rejects IC Report On Appointees' Handling Of "Workplace Violence" Claims. Politico (8/4, Toosi, 4.29M) reports that the State Department "sharply criticized and largely rejected" an inspector general's investigation which found "'substantial evidence' two Trump administration politic
ote) The California Club, Los Angeles Northwestern Law School, Chicago The Amazing Meeting (TAM), Las Vegas, NV Foundation for Critical Thinking (Nader event), Berkeley, Ca Federal Court Clerk Assn, Seattle, WA Trauma & Memory, Stockholm, Sweden What Matters To Me, and Why (UC-Irvine) Universit
NSULTING General Services Administration, 1974-77 5 EFTA00073074 Federal Trade Commission, 1976-77 Bay Area Rapid Transit, San Francisco, 1979 U.S. Department of Justice (National Crime Survey), 1980 Consultant for attorneys and other members of the legal profession in 34 US states, Canada, South Korea, Israel, Swed
es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmad, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 1
0: Exhibit 11: Exhibit 12: Notes from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York June 14, 2007 Email November 2020 Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility Notes from February 11, 2021 Call Notes from February 29, 2016 Meeting November 30, 2018 Email December 6
es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmed, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 13
t 1: Notes from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York Exhibit 2: June 14, 2007 Email Exhibit 3: November 2020 Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility Exhibit 4: Notes from February 11, 2021 Call Exhibit 5: Notes from February 29, 2016 Meeting Exhibit 6:
es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmed, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 13
t 1: Notes from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York Exhibit 2: June 14, 2007 Email Exhibit 3: November 2020 Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility Exhibit 4: Notes from February 11, 2021 Call Exhibit 5: Notes from February 29, 2016 Meeting Exhibit 6:
es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 40 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 35 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 35 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Alzmad, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 112 United States v. Ahmed, 10 Cr. 131 (
DFL has explained, the NPA did not bind other districts, and could not. That is because the USAO-SDFL lacked the authority to do so under applicable Department of Justice guidelines: Significantly, under the governing provision of the United States Attorney's Manual, the USAO-SDFL did not have the authority to unila
l Inc aril Warne re Vie Dr er elearce corral.? s n rea Ho aired in INK east a long: ,•• meteor Cl Coln me Par Mae COUNT/ BuiCti and 20n r0 Iked Nader, rd Coot k:.,ic.ty 5)1'0. Doi was a pall Greet, Orin c•nnoa n ay. Coat? Croat of une Na»a E!ett..CO Corr.:cleft NKOMO, He wit me-00. cf to Weil
withdrawal of US. troops. "Baghdad is worse to- day than it was three years ago." he said, adding. All of the information .. from the Pentagon and the State Department isn't always true." Really? The voters already had figured that out. According to a poll conducted for CNN this month by Opinion Research Corp. 6
es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmed, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 1
t 1: Notes from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York Exhibit 2: June 14, 2007 Email Exhibit 3: November 2020 Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility Exhibit 4: Notes from February 11, 2021 Call Exhibit 5: Notes from February 29, 2016 Meeting Exhibit 6:
Entities connected to both Nader and Department of Justice

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON