Epstein Secrets

at once? Distributions. Field effec=s time to compute / all the same time ? Synchronized =div class="gmail_quote"> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:24 AM Joscha > >=wrote: As you may have noticed, my whole train of thought on computationalism is b=sed on the rediscovery of intutionist mathematics under the

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 11:50 AM To: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: Energy? Unlimited? Equal per computation ? Non local ? Two places at once? Distributions. Field effec=s time to compute / all the

lculat= more than a Turing machine. However, that conflicts with the traditional =ntuitions of most of physics: that the universe is geometric, i.e. hyperco=putational. The fact that we cannot construct a hypercomputer, not just no= in physics, but also not mathematically (where we take its existence as g

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 11:56 AM To: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: reversibility. the theory should cohort with the evi=ence. I am aware of your beliefr structure the god=of zero and one plus computa

lculat= more than a Turing machine. However, that conflicts with the traditional =ntuitions of most of physics: that the universe is geometric, i.e. hyperco=putational. The fact that we cannot construct a hypercomputer, not just no= in physics, but also not mathematically (where we take its existence as g

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 12:15 PM To: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: i also see no learning in your system .? . eit=er it instantaneious.. fixed time and fixed time for each . computation t=ough answer

lculat= more than a Turing machine. However, that conflicts with the traditional =ntuitions of most of physics: that the universe is geometric, i.e. hyperco=putational. The fact that we cannot construct a hypercomputer, not just no= in physics, but also not mathematically (where we take its existence as g